Are you training TOO hard?
A lot of riders that come to me cycle coaching are training wrong… all wrong. Not only are they not reaching their potential due to this improper training, but they can even be hampering any meaningful progress at all. This is because they train too hard. Does any of this sound like you?
Typically you chose to ride a distance for training and then ride that distance as fast as you can.
You rely more heavily on high intensity intervals than on low intensity, long sustained efforts.
Very little if any of your training is done at such a casual pace that you could easily hold a conversation while training. This would be at a much lower intensity than your race pace.
You do not use any effort measuring device or scale to guide your training.
If any of that describes you, then you are training wrong.
Much to my surprise and perhaps yours as well, elite endurance athletes be it running, biking, swimming, rowing, cross country skiing, speed skating, etc spend the majority of time training at very low intensity levels that you probably wouldn’t even consider doing in your own training. Most people will say it doesn’t even feel like they are working out. It works though. Don’t believe me? Feel free to watch this 35 minute lecture by Dr Stephen Seiler who went out and studied this very thing while also working with Olympic caliber athletes in Norway’s Olympic program. In this lecture, he presents his findings from looking at the training methods of elite endurance athletes around the world. By elite, I mean sub-2:11 marathoners, Olympic gold medalist rowers and skiers, top Kenyan runners, elite cyclists, and so on.
Don’t have 30 minutes to watch a video? Let me summarise. Elite athletes spend 80-90% of their total training time at a very easy pace that does not even approach a speed they’d consider even a moderately hard effort. I’ll go onto the how’s and why’s in a moment, but I want to address a few typical complaints first.
But I’ve read how high intensity intervals are as good and even better at building endurance and things like VO2Max and lactate threshold! Long, slow efforts are old school and scientifically unsound!
That, my friend, is just wrong. We are indoctrinated into believing things like this by people looking to sell us something – typically a faster way to get results. There are no shortcuts to fitness in endurance sports. High intensity intervals are an absolutely essential part of training, but they only make up 5-10% of total training volume.
Training comprised mainly of high intensity intervals is the old school approach. Ever hear of Emil Zatopek? He was a gold medalist distance runner and coach from the 40’s and 50’s. His training was famously interval based (try 400m repeats for a marathon distance). The Germans tried that approach for their endurance athletes back in the 50’s and 60’s, and what they found was that fitness could be raised to a high level, but there was no year over year progress. Finally a coach named Arthur Lydiard hit the scene. He trained his guys in a long “base period” where they did miles and miles of slow, sustained effort work and that was followed by only a few weeks of sharpening for competition. Even his gold medal winning 800m sprinter put in weeks of nearly 100 slow miles. His guys TROUNCED the interval trained athletes. Eventually other national coaches adopted his methods as it was either adopt or fade into obscurity. It’s been a long enough time that people have forgotten the lessons and training mistakes of the past, so now the easier and less time consuming intervals are becoming en vogue again.
But Joe Bloggs trains mainly intervals and fast runs, and he kills John Smith in competitions! He’s probably faster than you too, slow poke!
This is totally possible especially in events with a shallow talent pool. Think of regional racing or local time trials. There will be a rider that performs well at a local level and have impressive resumes, but they aren’t elite cyclists. Somebody with a lot of natural talent and ability can be successful without optimal training. When you look at sports with large talent pools from all over the world, all the athletes at the top have very similar talent levels. There are razor thin differences separating somebody that podiums and somebody that is in the middle of the pack. Less than optimal training will magnify these differences, which is why you see most of the people training the same way. So Joe Bloggs may certainly be a beast… locally… or in small competitions… Joe Bloggs may destroy me in a competition too. Would he get trounced by the World Champ in a race of that distance? Yes, and this is how that world champ trains.
Tabata! Ever hear of it?!
The oft-cited and more oft-misunderstood Tabata study has a couple sticking points. The first being that the interval groups results plateaued at week 3 or 4. This is what is commonly seen by endurance coaches, thus the periodized plan of base building with brief periods of speed work/intervals. The non-interval group continued to make gains throughout the study and even finished with a higher VO2Max. The second sticking point is that the Tabata study has participants doing their intervals at 170% VO2Max. That is a huge intensity. Your max heart rate is essentially 100% your VO2Max… think of an effort 70% harder than even that! You simply aren’t going to be able replicate that with any regularity and thus it’d be intellectually dishonest to expect to realize similar gains as those seen in the study. (Yes this is a simplification for brevity’s sake) Did I mention the “interval subjects” still did a 10 minute “aerobic” warm up (70% VO2Max) as well as a training day every week where they trained with the steady-state group for their workout?
Alright, with that out of the way, let’s go into the how’s and why’s.
WHY #1 – Energy Systems – The Engine
This why is pretty simple if you know anything about the energy systems your body uses during exercise: the phosphagen system (good for extreme efforts of up 10 seconds – will be ignored for this article), the anaerobic system (efforts up to 2 minutes), and the aerobic system (dominant in most other durations). In reality, you aren’t going to have your energy demands met by a single system, but a dynamic blend of them. That said, the longer the duration, the more aerobic it is, and that’s important. To make it simple, your aerobic system is for long efforts and your anaerobic system is for sprints.
When you run *x* distance as fast you can, you run near or in excess of your lactate threshold. When your anaerobic energy system is being used, lactate levels rise in your blood. When the exercise is so intense that this lactate can no longer be cleared and will just keep accumulating it, you have reached your lactate threshold (LT)/anaerobic threshold (AT)/Onset of blood lactate accumulation (OBLA). You aren’t targeting and building your aerobic energy system because the effort is too strenuous. Likewise you aren’t targeting and building your anaerobic energy system because the effort is too light. You are targeting both of them in a very sub-optimal way. It’d be like trying to train your max strength bench press and your 100RM bench press endurance by just continually benching a weight somewhere in between the two.
What is optimal and what many elites do is target their aerobic system with very light efforts way under LT. Most of racing is aerobic work, so it makes sense to have a strong aerobic system. They will then have targeted speed workouts with heavy efforts way over LT. These account for 20% of the training sessions or 10% of total training time (as even LT workouts have aerobic lead ins, recoveries, and cool downs). For amateurs that aren’t training 10-15x/week, it’s easier to break down in terms of time. 10% of your time should be way above LT. This “polarized”/”hi-lo” approach allows you to directly target your aerobic and anaerobic systems individually building the capacity of each. As a key race approaches, you may add some more work in at/around LT to bake in your gains.
How low is low? Well these are the zones used by the Norwegian Olympians:
Zone 1 is where they have their athletes spend the overwhelming majority of time. To put this into perspective, my tested running max HR is 193. Zone 1 is anything 145bpm and lower. Zone 2 is where some training will occur, but the upper ends are too close to LT to be as useful. Zone 3 is LT and the sweet spot for most people racing or using the “run as fast as I can” approach. Zone 4 is where most of your intervals should be. Producing an 8-10 minute effort at zone 4 will be VERY hard. Zone 5 is basically an all out sprint. You won’t last for more than a handful of minutes here.
You may be thinking where some polarization is good, then more is better. Ie your intervals will be really intense. That isn’t what the data showed though. It showed that accumulated training time was as important as effort. 32 minutes of Zone 4 intervals (4×8:00) were more productive than 16:00 of zone 5 intervals (4×4:00).
This isn’t new training. This has been around for decades producing many of the champions we see. Check out elite rowers training distribution. 95% of their training is in Zone 1/Zone2
It’s just not sexy, so it doesn’t sell. Nobody wants to be told they’ll have to do hours and hours of frustratingly slow work every week. They’d rather be told that they can get the same or even better results in a fraction of the time with fun and challenging intervals.
WHY #2 – Specificity
General fitness is not the dominant factor in determining success in sport. If it were, then the fittest would also be the best. There are plenty of runners that may beat you that you could out-row, out-lift, and out-bike. By all accounts you are stronger and may have a better aerobic engine. Why then do they beat you? Because they run and run and run some more. The volume combined with the specific movement refines the technical/neurological skill of that movement. It is seen all the time in rock climbing, swimming, Judo, and other sports. Take the best Crossfitter with the strongest grip strength and throw him on a climbing wall. He’ll have circles climbed around him by people that can’t do 1/10th of what he does. He’ll be exhausted and pumped out while they climb up and down. Take an elite marathoner and throw him in a pool with the 10 year local swimming champ, and he’ll have circles swum around him. Take a strong, in-shape guy and throw him on a Judo mat, and he’ll be tossed into oblivion and gasping for breath. That of course begs the question just how transferable is our “supplemental” training to sport.
Another thing volume in the specific task helps do is build capill