Overview of the Review Paper
The concept of the maximal lactate steady state (MLSS) is central to understanding endurance performance, particularly in cycling. The review paper by Andrew M. Jones, Mark Burnley, Matthew I. Black, David C. Poole, and Anni Vanhatalo revisits this critical physiological marker, offering a fresh perspective on its definition and application.
Traditionally, MLSS has been associated with the highest exercise intensity at which lactate levels in the blood remain stable over time. This threshold is vital because it represents the balance between lactate production and clearance, indicating the point at which an athlete can sustain performance without fatigue rapidly setting in. However, the paper argues that the traditional understanding of MLSS, often referred to as the lactate threshold (LT) or critical power (CP), may need refinement.
Key Points from the Review
1. MLSS vs. Critical Power (CP) and Lactate Threshold (LT):
- The paper highlights that while CP and LT have been used interchangeably with MLSS, they are not identical. MLSS is more accurately defined as the highest intensity at which an athlete can maintain a steady metabolic state, characterised by stable blood lactate concentrations and a balanced oxygen uptake.
- CP, on the other hand, represents the power output that can be sustained indefinitely without fatigue, but this does not always equate to a steady state in lactate dynamics, especially in highly trained athletes.
2. Variability in MMSS:
- The review discusses the variability in MLSS between individuals and even within the same individual under different conditions. This variability can be influenced by factors such as training status, diet, environmental conditions, and time of day.
3. Assessment Methods:
- Traditionally, MLSS has been assessed using prolonged exercise tests at various intensities to determine the point at which lactate levels become unstable. The authors suggest that more refined methods, such as the use of gas exchange measurements and non-invasive monitoring techniques, could provide more accurate and individualised assessments of MLSS.
4. Implications for Training:
- Understanding and accurately determining MLSS is crucial for optimising training intensity. Training slightly below MLSS can enhance aerobic capacity and delay the onset of fatigue, while training above MLSS can lead to rapid fatigue and require longer recovery periods.
- The paper suggests that a more nuanced understanding of MLSS could lead to better-tailored training programs, particularly for elite athletes, where small differences in training intensity can have significant performance implications.
Integrating MLSS with INSCYD Reports for Robust Training Zones
The INSCYD testing platform is widely used by coaches and sports scientists to create detailed metabolic profiles for athletes. INSCYD provides insights into various physiological markers, including VO2max, VLamax (maximum lactate production rate), anaerobic threshold, and fat vs. carbohydrate utilisation. Combining the findings from the review paper with an INSCYD report can significantly enhance the precision of training zone establishment.
Step-by-Step Integration:
1. Determine the Athlete's MLSS:
- Utilise the insights from the review to more accurately pinpoint the athlete’s MMSS. Rather than relying solely on traditional lactate threshold or CP, use a combination of lactate dynamics, gas exchange data, and INSCYD’s metabolic insights. INSCYD can provide precise information on the power or intensity at which the athlete transitions from primarily aerobic metabolism to a state where lactate begins to accumulate (but not yet spike), closely reflecting MLSS.
2. Refine Training Zones:
- Zone 1 (Active Recovery): Below 55% of the MLSS intensity. Use INSCYD to adjust this zone based on fat oxidation rates.
- Zone 2 (Endurance): Typically 56-75% of MLSS. This is where aerobic capacity is developed, and INSCYD data can help refine this zone based on the athlete's fat and carbohydrate utilisation rates.
- Zone 3 (Tempo): 76-90% of MLSS. This zone is crucial for improving the ability to sustain moderate efforts for prolonged periods. The INSCYD report will indicate the athlete's carbohydrate consumption rate, helping to fine-tune this zone.
- Zone 4 (Threshold): 91-105% of MLSS. This is a critical zone for increasing the lactate threshold. The integration of INSCYD data ensures that the training is precise, targeting the exact point where lactate starts to accumulate rapidly.
- Zone 5 (VO2 Max): Above 105% of MLSS. This zone focuses on improving the maximum oxygen uptake. Here, VLamax data from INSCYD will guide the intensity to ensure maximal aerobic stimulus without unnecessary lactate accumulation.
3. Monitor and Adjust:
- Use continuous feedback from training sessions and periodic retesting with INSCYD to adjust the training zones. As the athlete's MLSS evolves with training, so too should the training zones. This dynamic approach ensures that the training remains aligned with the athlete's current physiological state.
4. Application in Training:
- Plan the distribution of training intensity across these zones according to the athlete's goals. For instance, if the goal is to enhance endurance, a higher percentage of training time might be spent in Zones 2 and 3, with specific sessions targeting Zone 4 to raise the MLSS.
5. Periodisation:
- Incorporate periodisation strategies by varying the focus on different zones throughout the training cycle. Early phases might emphasise lower-intensity work to build a base, while later phases could focus on increasing MLSS and VO2 max.
Conclusion
The review paper "The maximal metabolic steady state: redefining the ‘gold standard’" provides a critical re-evaluation of an essential concept in endurance training. By integrating these insights with the detailed metabolic data provided by an INSCYD report, coaches and athletes can develop highly individualised and effective training programs. This approach not only optimises performance by ensuring that training intensities are precisely targeted but also helps in managing fatigue and recovery, ultimately leading to better outcomes in competitive events.
Comments