Understanding the Polarisation-Index in Training
When it comes to endurance training, how you distribute your workout intensity—known as Training Intensity Distribution (TID)—is crucial. Enter the Polarisation-Index (PI), a straightforward calculation that helps distinguish between polarised and non-polarized training intensity distributions. Let's dive into what PI is, how to calculate it, and why it matters for your training regimen.
Introduction to Training Intensity Distribution (TID)
The Three-Zone Intensity Model
In endurance sports, workouts are often categorised into three intensity zones:
Zone 1 (Low Intensity): Easy efforts below the first lactate or ventilatory threshold. Think of this as a comfortable jog where conversation flows easily.
Zone 2 (Moderate Intensity): Moderate efforts between the first and second lactate or ventilatory thresholds. This is your steady, tempo pace—challenging but sustainable.
Zone 3 (High Intensity): Hard efforts above the second lactate or ventilatory threshold. These are your interval sprints or hill repeats, where talking becomes nearly impossible.
Importance of TID in Endurance Training
How you allocate time across these zones—your TID—plays a significant role in training adaptations and performance outcomes. Some athletes might spend most of their time in low-intensity workouts, while others might focus more on high-intensity sessions. Understanding and optimising your TID can lead to better performance gains and reduced injury risk.
FIGURE 1 | Various training intensity distributions (TID), their schematic proportions, and key characteristics (indicated by black bars). Zones refer to following intensities: Zone 1 (basic endurance), ≥50% ˙ VO2 max and ≤first lactate or ventilatory threshold; Zone 2 (lactate threshold), ≥first and ≤second lactate or ventilatory threshold; Zone 3 (high intensity), >second lactate or ventilatory threshold.
What is the Polarisation-Index (PI)?
Definition and Purpose of PI
The Polarisation-Index (PI) is a metric designed to quantify how polarised your training is. In simple terms, it tells you whether your training distribution leans more towards a polarised model (emphasising both low and high intensities with minimal moderate intensity) or a non-polarised model.
Line A indicates the upper limit of Zone 3 for a given (x-axis) fraction of Zone 1 (condition a: Zone 1 + Zone 2 + Zone 3 = 1), line B indicates the lower limit of Zone 3 for a given fraction of Zone 1 (condition b: Zone 3 >Zone 2), line C indicates the upper limit of Zone 3 for a given fraction of Zone 1 (condition c: Zone 1 >Zone 3), and line d indicates the lower limit of Zone 3 for a given fraction of Zone 1 (condition d: Zone 1 >Zone 2). The colored areas represent the range of values where conditions a-d are fulfilled. The grey broken line indicates the limit of Zone 3 for a given fraction of Zone 1 resulting in a polarization-index of 2.00 a.U., i.e., if Zone 3 is higher or lower, polarisation-index will result in values higher (green area) or lower than 2.00 a.U. (yellow area), respectively. The broken blue line indicates the upper limit of Zone 2 for a given fraction of Zone 1 to allow for a polarisation-index ≥2.00 a.U
Step-by-Step Calculation Guide
Calculating PI involves a logarithmic formula:
Where:
Zone 1: Total time or distance spent in low-intensity training.
Zone 2: Total time or distance spent in moderate-intensity training.
Zone 3: Total time or distance spent in high-intensity training.
Example Calculation
Let's say over a week, an athlete logs the following training times:
Zone 1: 8 hours
Zone 2: 1 hour
Zone 3: 1 hour
Plugging these into the formula: A PI value greater than 2.00 suggests a polarised training distribution, while lower values indicate a non-polarised approach. In this example, the PI of -1.10 indicates a non-polarised TID.
Differentiating Between Polarised and Non-Polarised TIDs
In a polarised training model, athletes allocate a significant portion of their training to both low and high intensities, with minimal time spent in moderate intensity. A typical distribution might be:
Zone 1: 80%
Zone 2: 5%
Zone 3: 15%
This approach aims to maximise the benefits of both low-intensity endurance building and high-intensity performance gains, while avoiding the "grey zone" of moderate intensity that may lead to stagnation.
Characteristics of Non-Polarised TID
Non-polarised training models, such as pyramidal or threshold-focused distributions, involve more time spent in moderate-intensity zones. For example:
Pyramidal TID: Gradual decrease from low to high intensity (e.g., 70% Zone 1, 20% Zone 2, 10% Zone 3).
Threshold TID: Emphasis on moderate intensity (e.g., 40% Zone 1, 50% Zone 2, 10% Zone 3).
These models can be effective but may not provide the same balance of adaptations as a polarised approach.
Applying the Polarisation-Index in Training Programs
Benefits of Using PI for Coaches and Athletes
For coaches and athletes, the PI offers a clear, quantifiable measure to assess and adjust training intensity distribution. By monitoring PI, you can ensure your training aligns with your performance goals, whether that's building endurance, increasing speed, or preparing for competition.
Limitations and Considerations
While PI is a useful tool, it's not without limitations. It doesn't account for individual differences in response to training, the quality of sessions, or factors like recovery and nutrition. Therefore, it's essential to use PI alongside other metrics and personal insights to tailor the most effective training program.
Conclusion
The Polarisation-Index provides a simple yet powerful way to evaluate and distinguish between polarised and non-polarised training intensity distributions. By understanding and applying PI, athletes and coaches can make informed decisions to optimise training strategies and enhance performance outcomes.
FAQs
What is a good Polarisation-Index value?
A PI value greater than 2.00 suggests a polarised training distribution, which is often associated with improved endurance performance.
Can I use PI for any endurance sport?
Yes, the PI can be applied across various endurance sports, including running, cycling, and swimming, to assess training intensity distribution.
How often should I calculate my PI?
It's beneficial to calculate your PI regularly, such as weekly or monthly, to monitor and adjust your training intensity distribution as needed.
Does a higher PI always mean better performance?
Not necessarily. While a higher PI indicates a polarised training distribution, individual responses to training can vary. It's important to consider personal factors and consult with a coach
Sources:
댓글